Saturday, November 27, 2010

Wiki Leaks!!!

I'm shocked that Wiki is doing something so dangerous some things do not need to be access. I agree that these leaks are endangering peoples lives. Some of the documents have information about U.S allies so this is not just effecting the country but the world as well. I understand that the American people should have a right to know what the government is doing but I don't think it should be at the expense of people lives. I think this is a situation when technology has gone to far because its invading papers that could have significant effect on peoples lives and that's not right.

Palin addresses the media about South Korea and North Korea blunder!

While talking to Glen Beck earlier this week Sarah Palin mistakenly mixed up North Korea with South Korea as calling them are allies. So she took to Facebook to address the media. "

Monday, November 22, 2010

Is Palin reality show pioneering a new era of campaigning?

Since Palin's TLC show is a hit bringing in 5 million viewers some critics are saying its a new way of campaigning. I think that could be true because the show focuses on family values which is a hardcore belief that Palin believes in. Since this is a new era of politics in which parties dont know who will be running for president a reality show could be a new way of sharing candidates views while avoiding filters. I think its a creative way for using media to get your message across since reality show are here to stay. But I still believe that just because people may have an interest in politicians lifestyles doesn't mean they would take them serious enough to vote for them.

Do you think more politicians will be following Palin's footsteps?

Palin pioneers reality campaigning

By Julian E. Zelizer, Special to CNN
November 22, 2010 8:19 a.m. EST
"Sarah Palin's Alaska," a new reality show on TLC, is attracting a large audience.
"Sarah Palin's Alaska," a new reality show on TLC, is attracting a large audience.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Sarah Palin's reality show may represent new way of running for president, says Julian Zelizer
  • He says for a long time, party bosses chose the presidential candidates
  • Zelizer says reforms gave that power to primaries under scrutiny of the news media
  • Palin, other candidates can bypass media and make their case directly to voters, he says

Editor's note: Julian E. Zelizer is a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University. He is the author of "Jimmy Carter" published by Times Books and editor of a book assessing former President George W. Bush's administration published by Princeton University Press.

Princeton, New Jersey (CNN) -- Sarah Palin's new reality show looks like it might become a hit.

During its first week, "Sarah Palin's Alaska" attracted almost five million viewers, the best that a premiere has done on the TLC network.

The same week that the show debuted, there were reports that Palin was talking with insiders about a presidential run. She told ABC News that she believed she could defeat President Obama in 2012.

The launch of the show has felt very much like the start of a presidential campaign.

If this turns out to be true, Palin's reality show could be a harbinger of campaigns to come. We might be witnessing the start of a new era in presidential campaigning, where candidates take their message directly to the voters while avoiding almost any filters in the process.

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Sarah Palin's Alaska!

Viewing the first look at Sarah Palin's Alaska which premieres tonight looks pretty good. Palin looks like she feels the most comfortable with her family and outdoors than discussing politics to a crowd of middle class citizens. I think the show is a bright idea, she wants people to view her as a humble citizen of Alaska not this politician who's desperate to run for President. People may have mixed reviews on her capabilities to lead the nation but I think after watching her show on TLC people will have no questions that she is a person that has values, morals and put family first and that is good for America to see someone who's values family and the environment. So I may not agree with her politics but I do agree with her on how she spends her quality time. SO AMERICA TAKE NOTES!!!!!

Saturday, November 13, 2010

Obama tour Asia

Obama visits Asia with mixed results, he was able to put the finishing touches on the nuclear arms pact he also added a billions dollars to modernized the nuclear arsenal. He also accomplished a new trade pact with India and a broad cooperative agreement with Indonesia and a pledge by 20 top nations to work towards economy that evens out a destabilizing surpluses and deficits. But still did not come to terms with China and the undervalued currency.



Obama turns to Russian diplomacy as Asia trip ends

Barack Obama, Naoto Kan, Nobuko KanAP – Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan, center, and his wife Nobuko welcome President Barack Obama at the …

YOKOHAMA, Japan – President Barack Obama, capping a far-flung trip of mixed results, said Saturday the United States is "here to stay" as a force in Asia and pivoted to Russian diplomacy as a nuclear treaty hung in the balance.

In his final hours in Japan, Obama was meeting with Russian PresidentDmitry Medvedev as the White House scrambled to round up votes for ratification of a nuclear arms pact that the two leaders signed in April. The administration was offering to add billions of dollars for modernizing the U.S. nuclear arsenal to woo Republican support.

Obama was finishing an Asia trip so widespread — from the growing democracies of India and Indonesia to the summit-hosting allies of South Korea and Japan — that Air Force One was headed all the way around the globe. Amid the skeptical press coverage of all Obama didn't get done, the White House worked its own message, saying Obama had planted Asia at the center of his foreign policy, helped lead a fresh global economic strategy and reached billions of Asians with his words.

The president's weekend work at APEC had a quieter, winding-down tone as even his aides joked about the trip's length.

Obama told business leaders that the United States would unapologetically and fiercely compete to get jobs to America, where near double-digit unemployment has sapped public spirits and cost Democrats mightily in this month's midterm elections. He sought to assure Asia-Pacific nations that their success would not come at each other's expense.

"We stand ready to lead again," Obama declared. The comments came in the context of a narrative, vehemently denied by the White House, that Obama had lost some international clout as U.S. voters had shifted more power to Republicans.

A comfortable-looking Obama met with the leaders of Japan and Australia, inviting them both to visit him next year, and he took part in APEC's consensus-centered meetings on the expansion of trade. He was to wrap his trip with the Medvedev meeting, closing summit business and a visit to an iconic Great Buddha statue he had visited as boy.

On the nuclear pact, known as the New START treaty, the administration is lobbying for enough Republican support in the Senate for ratification before the Democrats' majority shrinks by six in January. National security adviser Tom Donilon said Saturday that completing the deal is a White House priority for the postelection congressional session that begins when Obama returns. He said Obama would assure Medvedev of that but did not go further in predicting ratification.

The treaty would reduce the limit on strategic warheads to 1,550 for each country from the current ceiling of 2,200. It also would set up new procedures to allow both countries to inspect each other's arsenals to verify compliance.

Obama is about to come home with new trade pacts with India, a broad cooperative agreement with Indonesia and a pledge by 20 top nations to work toward an economy that evens out destabilizing surpluses and deficits. Yet he could not meet his own deadline to close a huge South Korean trade pact, and China's undervalued currency remains a huge obstacle.

Beyond those clear measures, the White House talked about Obama's harder-to-quantify commitment to Asia as a strategic center of power. Donilon went so far as to describe Obama's trips to India and Indonesia as seminal moments.

"We had at one point last week the president of the United States, the secretary of defense, the secretary of state and the secretary of the treasury all in Asia," he said.

___

Associated Press writer Desmond Butler in Washington contributed to this report.



Sunday, October 24, 2010

GAYS VOTERS ANGRY AT DEMOCRATS!!!!

Gay voters are angry at the President and Democrats because of the lack of improvements of gay rights. I totally agree with them I would be angry to if I didn't have the right to tell people my sexual orientation or get married or even face discrimination everyday and no one cares. This is a civil rights crime and its being overlooked. President Obama is trying to change the law of "dont ask dont tell" but I honestly think that people have to realize that dealing with civil rights is going to take time Obama only been in office for two he has so many things to worry about the economy, war,unemployment, education, new ways for energy. I totally support gays but in all honesty I think they still need to support Obama and the Dems and be patience because their only other option are Republicans and I'm sure the GOP would gladly fight for gay rights lol.


Gay voters angry at Democrats could sway election

CHICAGO – Kate Coatar is seriously considering voting for Green Party candidates instead of Democrats, whom she normally supports. James Wyatt won't cast a ballot at all because he no longer trusts anyone to fight for causes important to him.

If Democratic candidates are counting on long-standing support from gay voters to help stave off big losses on Nov. 2, they could be in for a surprise.

Across the country, activists say gay voters are angry — at the lack of progress on issues from eliminating employment discrimination to uncertainty over serving in the military to the economy — and some are choosing to sit out this election or look for other candidates.

President Barack Obama's hometown of Chicago, with its large, politically and socially active gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community, offers a snapshot of what some are calling the "enthusiasm gap" between voters who came out strong for Obama and other Democrats in 2008 and re-energized Republican base voters, including tea party enthusiasts who say they are primed to storm the polls.

It didn't help that the controversy over the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy for gays erupted less than two weeks before the election, when a judge overturned it, then Obama's justice department decided to fight the judge's decision. On Thursday, the Defense Department declared that "don't ask, don't tell" is official policy but set up a new system that could make it tougher to get thrown out of the military for being openly gay.

"It's all talk and nothing's happening, and I'm just over it," said Coatar, 62, a church business manager who said she's as concerned about health care and homelessness as about gay issues. "I don't know who to vote for and the election is a week away."

Wyatt, 35, a maintenance worker at the Center on Halsted, a community center serving Chicago's GLBT community, said politicians only court gay voters at election time.

"Once they're elected, they're not fighting for things like civil unions or same-sex marriage or ending 'don't ask, don't tell' because they're hot-button issues," said Wyatt, who usually supports Democrats. "We're just used as a piggyback for them to get into office. It's absurd."

Whether or not that's the case, Wyatt isn't the only one who feels that way.

And in places like Cook County, Ill., where the gay population represents about 7 percent of voters, that could mean the difference between victory and defeat in some races, said Rick Garcia, director of public policy for Equality Illinois. One of those races is a much-watched and close battle for Obama's old Senate seat between Democrat Alexi Giannoulias and Republican Mark Kirk.

"If (candidates) can mobilize the gay community and get them out to vote, it could make all the difference in the world in some of these key races," said Garcia.

But volunteers who've been calling the 18,000 or so members of Equality Illinois to urge them to vote have been getting an earful. Many members say they won't vote or will vote against incumbents, regardless of their party affiliation or stance on gay issues.

This year's election is a stark contrast to 2008, when the gay community turned out in droves to elect Obama and help Democrats regain control of Congress.

"People were clamoring and very excited about the change that then-candidate Obama promised America," Garcia said. "Now I see lethargy at best and disgust at worst."

He said gains won under Obama, including in fighting housing discrimination, have not filtered out to many in the gay community because "the big issues have not appeared to change at all."

"But change takes time; sometimes it takes a lot of time. A lot of folks just don't understand that," said Garcia. "I am older and more seasoned, but most people are very disturbed with the administration ... and they're the hard ones to get out to vote.

"The message is huge: Don't take us for granted."

Tracy Baim, publisher of Windy City Times, Chicago's oldest and largest GLBT newspaper, and author of the new book "Obama and the Gays," said disappointment is showing up in another way: Some are refusing to donate money to candidates until they see progress, although it's difficult to gauge how much that has affected fundraising.

A message left Friday with the Democratic National Committee seeking comment was not immediately returned.

But many gay organizations are working hard to get voters to the polls, fearing they could face setbacks if Republicans retake control of Congress. Baim said Democrats and Obama still enjoy widespread support in some parts of the gay community, particularly among African-Americans and Latinos, and she believes the majority still will vote.

"People are disappointed but understand that this really is the best hope for significant change over the next several years," she said. "But at the same time, the anger is very real."

Robin McGehee, co-founder and director of the national gay-rights organization GetEQUAL calls the mood among gay voters a "disappointment canyon" but said they have no choice but to go to the polls.

She, however, is refusing to donate to or volunteer for any candidate this year. And members of her group are protesting wherever Obama appears on the campaign trail.

"We can't not take advantage of the right to vote, but that doesn't mean we can't vote smartly," said McGehee, of Fresno, Calif. "If I was a leader in the Democratic Party, I would be worried.

"Either we're important enough to fight for our equality or we're worth losing," she said. "Right now we're being treated like we're worth losing."

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Rick Sanchez

I'm kinda of shocked that CNN let go of Rick Sanchez even though he been with them for six years!
So I guess Rick Sanchez was right that the media is ran by Jews because it is highly unlikely that if Mr. Sanchez commented on Mexicans or even Blacks I don't think they would have fired him and I'm going on past comments that have been made about the races from Journalist. But once Rick speaks about Jews its "off with his head". I feel bad for Rick Sanchez because he literally spoke his mind and he got fired for it! I hope Rick comes back on TV but not as a Journalist but as a talk show host where he has the freedom to express his opinions and people can
understand where he is coming from!

Rick Sanchez Publicly Apologizes for "Inartful" Comments

Rick Sanchez

Rick Sanchez issued a public apology Wednesday, calling his comments about Jon Stewart "inartful" and "mangled," according to a statement obtained by Variety.

In the statement, the 52-year-old said he had a very good conversation with Jon Stewart on Monday when he was able to apologize for his "inartful" comments. Sanchez also extended his apology to anyone who was offended.

Jon Stewart: Rick Sanchez could replace Steve Carell on The Office

Stewart addressed the situation on Monday's Daily Show, joking that Sanchez could replace Michael Scott on The Office. However, Stewart also said that Sanchez "probably" has a good heart.

"As Jon was kind enough to note in his show Monday night, I am very much opposed to hate and intolerance, in any form, and I have frequently spoken out against prejudice," Sanchez said. "Despite what my tired and mangled words may have implied, they were never intended to suggest any sort of narrow-mindedness and should never have been made."

Rick Sanchez fired from CNN after calling Jon Stewart a "bigot"

During an interview on the Sirius XM radio show Stand Up with Peter Dominick last Thursday, Sanchez said Stewart was a "bigot" and suggested that Jews run many major media outlets.

Following his remarks, Sanchez was let go from CNN Friday after six years. He had been with the network for six years and hosted the afternoon program Rick's List since January. Sanchez has since been replaced by Brooke Baldwin.

"I want to go on record to say that I have nothing but the highest regard for CNN and for my six wonderful years with them. I appreciate every opportunity that they have given me, and it has been a wonderful experience working for them," he said. "I have tremendous respect for everyone there, and I know that they feel the same about me. There are no hard feelings — just excitement about a new future of opportunities."